Relationship Archetypes

Who Are You
in Relationships?

Six evidence-based relationship archetypes grounded in Attachment Theory and Big Five personality research. Discover your pattern, understand your compatibility, and identify your growth edges.

Based on Bowlby (1969), Ainsworth (1978), Hazan & Shaver (1987), Costa & McCrae (1992) — not MBTI typology.

PostShare
5-Question Assessment

Find Your Relationship Archetype

Five questions grounded in Attachment Theory and Big Five personality research. Discover which of the six evidence-based archetypes best describes your relational patterns — and who you are most compatible with.

The Anchor
The Seeker
The Fortress
The Stormchaser
The Architect
The Empath

Takes approximately 2 minutes · Based on ECR-R & Big Five research

Secure

The Anchor

Stable, consistent, and emotionally available

Openness65%
Agreeableness80%
Neuroticism25%
~55% of adultsExplore →
Anxious-Preoccupied

The Seeker

Deeply loving, intensely present, and afraid of being left

Openness70%
Agreeableness75%
Neuroticism80%
~20% of adultsExplore →
Dismissive-Avoidant

The Fortress

Self-sufficient, guarded, and deeply afraid of needing anyone

Openness55%
Agreeableness45%
Neuroticism35%
~25% of adultsExplore →
Fearful-Avoidant

The Stormchaser

Craves connection and fears it in equal measure

Openness75%
Agreeableness60%
Neuroticism85%
~5–10% of adults (higher in clinical populations)Explore →
Secure

The Architect

Deliberate, principled, and deeply committed to building something lasting

Openness60%
Agreeableness65%
Neuroticism30%
~15% of adults (high Conscientiousness + Secure attachment combination)Explore →
Anxious

The Empath

Deeply attuned, emotionally generous, and prone to losing themselves in love

Openness80%
Agreeableness92%
Neuroticism65%
~20% of adults (high Agreeableness + Anxious attachment combination)Explore →
Scientific Basis

Why Not MBTI?

These archetypes are grounded in Attachment Theory (Bowlby, 1969; Ainsworth, 1978) and the Big Five personality model (Costa & McCrae, 1992) — the two most empirically validated frameworks in relationship psychology. Unlike MBTI, which has poor test-retest reliability (Pittenger, 1993), these frameworks have been replicated across 50+ cultures and have strong predictive validity for relationship outcomes.

AiAmor Index

Evidence-based psychological interventions for relationship health.

Attachment TheoryGottman MethodEmotionally Focused TherapyCognitive Behavioural ScienceSelf-Determination TheoryInterpersonal Neurobiology

Build your personalised recovery protocol in 5 minutes.

Build My Protocol →

© 2026 Amor Index. For informational purposes only. Not a substitute for professional psychological advice.

Evidence-based · Peer-reviewed · Updated periodically